I’m developing a bit of a love-hate relationship with AI. While I love using it as a tool to analyze my work-related data and my personal financial strategy, I hate that it’s putting my writing career at risk of serious disruption. That recently led me to turn to my potential replacement to help me craft a financial independence strategy.
It helped me develop a very detailed plan of action to future-proof my finances from AI disruption. However, AI did get a few things completely wrong when planning my financial future. Here are two big mistakes it made and what I learned from the exercise.
Missed Nvidia in 2009? This Rare Signal Is Flashing Again. In 2009, a “Double Down” signal flashed for a little-known chipmaker called Nvidia. For the first time in years, that same “Total Conviction” signal is flashing for a company 1/100th the size of Nvidia. Continue »
A big passive income oversight
I used Anthropic’s Claude to plan a path to financial freedom for my wife and me, to help ease my anxiety about a potential AI disruption to my income as a writer. The goal was to determine the best path forward for our situation, given our current ages and the gap between when we can make penalty-free withdrawals from our retirement accounts.
Claude recommended we build a bridge to help me transition into retirement slowly. It suggested that we focus on contributing to our Roth IRA and taxable brokerage account to build a bridge that can cover more of our living expenses until we can start withdrawing from tax-deferred accounts. After working through the numbers, Claude initially projected that we should build our contributions to these accounts by another 65% to achieve financial freedom. That seemed like a daunting task, considering that AI could disrupt my profession in the next couple of years.
However, there was one major flaw in its assumption. Claude failed to account for any of our passive income, including current pension income. After questioning the numbers, Claude admitted: “Going back through the math, I never subtracted the pension — that was an oversight, not a deliberate choice. Since it’s guaranteed lifetime income, independent of markets.” That made a meaningful difference, closing the gap to a more managable 31%.
The right investment in the wrong account
Claude suggested we build a three-tiered strategy that includes a one-year, completely liquid transition fund to cover an AI-related job loss, followed by a bridge growth fund to last until we can tap our tax-deferred retirement accounts. It advised building the bridge growth fund by maxing out Roth IRA contributions before adding any more capital to the taxable brokerage account.

